In the event that they are a similar cost and you have a viable board, you are silly not to purchase the 5900x. I'm not stunned that the 3900x is something very similar or greater. Is it even done as such far? While perhaps not low stock and costs are ascending since you can't think that they are new with such ease. Poo 2700x new on amazon $414.
I just introduced 5900X two days prior. This is astounding. A leap from six centers to twelve - constantly. I can stay away forever. Everything appears to be so smooth and works such a great deal better.
Beyond specially appointed jobs/errands, you "feel" the improved per-string execution, not the quantity of centers/strings.
In the event that you're purchasing new, getting the 5900X is, obviously, simple. On the off chance that you as of now have a 3900X, I couldn't say whether it's truly worth the redesign, particularly while playing at 1440p/4K.
The main conceivable motivation to purchase the 3900x is in the event that it's fundamentally less expensive, on the grounds that you have a viable cell phone for the 3900, however you'll have to get one for the 5900.
How could you try and consider getting a 3900x? I mean the 5900x ought to have better memory similarity. Presently it comes to the board. In the event that you have b450/x470 and up, pick 5000x. Assuming that you have a x370 and a320 (some a320s support the 5000 series), pick the 3900.
Everything relies upon the goal and least casing rate you are attempting to accomplish. 1080p165 or more, you would benefit extraordinarily from 5900x.
Regular 1440p144/120? You will in any case get a recognizable hit, yet all at once it's not constantly. 4k? You can even 12900K, there will be no distinction.
